Designing and Fuzzification a Comprehensive Expert System of Higher Education Institutions Performance Evaluation Based on Balanced Score Card & Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

Higher education plays a very vital role in developing human resources as well as economic ones in every country. In so doing, the act of evaluation would help the decision makers as well as managers to spot the weaknesses to use the required provisions to work more effectively. The present study with a different approach toward the designing a comprehensive evaluation expert system using Fuzzy Logic technique regarding evaluating the performance of Higher Education Institutes conducted as a case study on Azad University of Najaf Abad. Appropriate criteria for evaluation were selected through balanced score card as a comprehensive methodology of evaluation. Then, based on four perspectives of Balanced Score Card, criteria were categorized on priority and the level of importance employing Fuzzy multi-Criteria decision making. Then, drawn upon the results of the previous step, a performance evaluation fuzzy expert system based on the criteria’s weights was designed using the tool box of Fuzzy Logic in MATLAB software.

Keywords


[1]      Asgharpour, M.J. (2008). Multi Criteria Decision making, fifth edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press.

[2]      Rezaei Champion, M.R. And Sayed Hosseni, SR. (2011). Twelve steps to develop and implement a balanced scorecard and to determine the performance indexes. Tehran: Publication berga

[3]      Kaplan, Norton. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting tangible assets to tangible outcomes, Harvard Business Review Press, first edition, February 2.

[4]      Momeni, M. (2006). Modern Topics in Operations Research. Tehran: Tehran University Press.

[5]      Mehregan, M.R., Dehghan Nayeri, M. (2009). Strategic Assessment Model Institutions of Higher Education, Research and Planning in Higher Education program, Vol.52, no.52, pp 55-79.

[6]      Chris, P., Einstin, W. (2006). Insights from Balanced Scorecard: Implementing Balanced Scorecard at a Collage of Business”. Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.10, No.3, pp 15-22.

[7]       Goran, O., Sjostrand, A. (2005). The Balanced Scorecard. Center of Iran Industrial Research and education publication, vol. 141.

[8]      Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996a). Translating Strategy into Action the Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

[9]      Sarfaraz, A., Mukerjee, P., Jenabb, K. (2012). Using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate web development platform. ManagementScience Letters, Vol.2, pp 253–262.

[10] Chris, P., & Einstin, W. (2006). Insights from Balanced Scorecard: Implementing Balanced Scorecard at a Collage of Business. Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.10, No.3, PP 15-22.

[11] Cullen, j., Joyce. J.H, Broadbent, T. (2003). Quality in Higher Education. Monitoring Quality Assurance in Education, Vol.11, No.1, PP 5-14.

[12] Kaplan, R.S. , Norton. D.P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I, AccountingHorizons, Vol.15, No.1, pp 104.

[13] Nayeri, M. D., Mashhadi, M., Mohajer, K. (2008). Universities Strategic Evaluation Using Balanced Scorecard. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol.2, No. 1-25

[14] Pineno, C. J. (2008). The Business School Strategy: Continuous Improvement by the Balanced Scorecard. Research in Higher Educational Journal, retrieved from: http://www.aabri.com/08016.pdf.

[15] Umashankar, Dutta. (2007). Balanced Scorecards in Managing Higher Education Institutions: an Indian Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.21, No.1, PP 54-67.